How states stand to gain or lose federal funds by opting in or out of the Medicaid expansion.

نویسندگان

  • Sherry Glied
  • Stephanie Ma
چکیده

Following the Supreme Court’s decision in 2012, state officials are now deciding whether to expand their Medicaid programs under the Affordable Care Act. While the states’ costs of participating in the Medicaid expansion have been at the forefront of this discussion, the expansion has much larger implications for the flow of federal funds going to the states. This issue brief examines how participating in the Medicaid expansion will affect the movement of federal funds to each state. States that choose to participate in the expansion will experience a more positive net flow of federal funds than will states that choose not to participate. In addition to providing valuable health insurance benefits to low-income state residents, and steady sources of financing to state health care providers, the Medicaid expansion will be an important source of new federal funds for states.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A "Cap" on Medicaid: How Block Grants, Per Capita Caps, and Capped Allotments Might Fundamentally Change the Safety Net.

Changing the Medicaid program is a top priority for the Republican party. Common themes from GOP proposals include converting Medicaid from a jointly financed entitlement benefit to a form of capped federal financing. While proponents of this reform argue that it would provide greater flexibility and a more predictable budget for state governments, serious consequences would likely result for M...

متن کامل

The Constitutionality of Federal Grant Conditions after National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius

In March 2010, Congress passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The ACA, among other things, requires states to expand Medicaid eligibility or lose Medicaid funding. Following the enactment of the ACA, state attorneys general and others brought several lawsuits challenging various provisions of the act on constitutional grounds. In National Federation of Independent Busines...

متن کامل

Federal Funding Insulated State Budgets From Increased Spending Related To Medicaid Expansion.

As states weigh whether to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and Medicaid reform remains a priority for some federal lawmakers, fiscal considerations loom large. As part of the ACA's expansion of eligibility for Medicaid, the federal government paid for 100 percent of the costs for newly eligible Medicaid enrollees for the period 2014-16. In 2017 states will pay some of the co...

متن کامل

Medicaid expansion opt-outs and uncompensated care.

n engl j med 367;25 nejm.org december 20, 2012 2365 new front in the health care reform debate. By a seven-to-two margin, the justices found unduly coercive the government’s plan to withhold all federal Medicaid funds from states that don’t expand their Medicaid programs. Staking out a middle ground, the Court ruled that the ACA’s Medicaid expansion could go forward as an option for states. Alr...

متن کامل

176-181 Gold

been a lightning rod for opponents. Title X funds are distributed directly by the federal government to a range of grantees, which include state agencies as well as nonprofit organizations such as Planned Parenthood affiliates and regional family planning councils. Title X funds are distributed in all states. Two major federal block grants, the maternal and child health (MCH) and the social ser...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Issue brief

دوره 32  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013